None of these are bad SUVs - even last place wasn’t far behind most competitors, especially in the subjective categories we judge.
All included Apple CarPlay and all but one had Android Auto. Every SUV included all-wheel drive, forward collision warning with automatic emergency braking, a moonroof, in-dash navigation, dual automatic climate control and more. We targeted higher-end trim levels with volume-selling engines that offered the most similar features, which meant a V-6 for the Jeep Cherokee and four-cylinders (two turbocharged) for the others. We focused the test on SUVs updated or redesigned since our last compact SUV test in 2017 and invited back podium finishers (Tiguan, CR-V and Mazda CX-5). Perhaps the most recognized small SUVs in this class are the eternally feuding Honda CR-V and redesigned-for-2019 Toyota RAV4, which we tested in a multiday comparison along with five other 2019 models: the updated Hyundai Tucson, updated Jeep Cherokee, Nissan Rogue, redesigned Subaru Forester and defending champion of this test, the Volkswagen Tiguan. The Editorial department is independent of ’s advertising, sales and sponsored content departments.With a killer combination of affordability, utility and fuel economy, the juggernaut compact SUV class is partially responsible for marginalizing the classic family sedan. In line with ’s long-standing ethics policy, editors and reviewers don’t accept gifts or free trips from automakers. Want more? Take a deep dive into each group by reading our comparisons.Ĭars.com’s Editorial department is your source for automotive news and reviews. Use these volumes as a comparison tool, but remember that the space in your prospective car may vary. Lower trims may have variances - a missing stereo subwoofer, for example - that affect cargo space. Second, the stated volumes reflect the cars we tested, which were generally well-equipped top trim levels. Although measured volume made up most of each SUV’s respective score, it didn’t make up all of it. That’s because we also factored in features that aid in accommodating cargo, such as powered liftgates or cargo-area controls to fold the seats down. You’ll want to note two things: First, the cargo scores you see in our multicar comparisons may not directly correlate with as-tested cargo volumes here. Ranger, Gladiator, Ridgeline, Canyon: Which Has the Best Bed and Tailgate?.Honda Odyssey: A Couch-Hauling Comparison
What’s the Best Three-Row SUV for 2019?.View all 2020 Hyundai Palisade models for sale near 60606 Even folded into the load floor, the third row takes up some cargo height it’s likely that a two-row Tiguan would have more as-tested cargo space. Note that the Tiguan we tested had Volkswagen’s available third row, which we folded down for the test. Such areas add incremental volume but aren’t as useful for large objects. The above numbers exclude any compartments underneath the cargo floor, a provision many SUVs now offer. We positioned any second-row seats with sliding adjustments to their rearmost positions and lowered any height-adjustable cargo floors to their lowest points. 2019 Volkswagen Tiguan: 14.12 cubic feetįor all SUVs, we set any reclining seatbacks to a position as close as possible to 110 degrees with the ground - a comfortable angle for passengers.To measure each cargo area, we stacked boxes behind the second row up to the height of the seatbacks - not to the top of the head restraints or ceiling, where you shouldn’t stack cargo for the sake of visibility and safety - with the liftgate able to easily close. Compact SUVsĮarly in 2019, measured volume behind the second row among seven compact SUVs for our 2019 Compact SUV Challenge. Each comparison included measurements of cargo space, either with stacked boxes or measured dimensions. In 2019, we compared three groups of mass-market SUVs: compact models, mid-size two-row SUVs and larger SUVs with three rows. That’s why independently measures cargo space in our multicar comparison tests. View all 2019 Toyota RAV4 models for sale near 60606